involved. If everyone is allowed to bypass the procedure provided in the statute passed by the legislature and invoke such extraordinary jurisdiction or the supervisory jurisdiction, then the provision found in the statute, in this case Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, will be reduced to a dead letter. Above all in the concerned provision of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, namely Section 115, an embargo has been provided under the proviso to sub clause (1) for the exercise of the power of revision. The proviso states that no revision shall be entertained by the High Court, if the order challenged had otherwise been in favour of the person filing the revision, it would not have resulted in the termination or final disposal of the proceeding before the court below. Such a bar is not attracted in the present case. The order challenged is one passed dismissing the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed for rejection of the plaint. If the order had been in favour of the revision petitioner, it would have resulted in the rejection of the plaint, which would be the termination of the proceeding before the trial court. Hence the bar provided in the proviso does not get attracted to the case in hand.
