High Court closed two civil revision petitions involving matrimonial disputes upon receiving a settlement memorandum of compromise filed by the parties through their counsel.
Civil revision petitions C.R.P.Nos.3073 and 3074 of 2011 were closed based on the filed memorandum of compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on: 21.07.2016
Pronounced on: 28.11.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
C.R.P.Nos.3073 and 3074 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
Mary Sowmya Rose .. Petitioner in both CRPs rep.by Power Agent and father A.John Rose Vs Terance Alex .. Respondent in both CRPs
Prayer in CRP.No.3073 of 2011: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the docket order dated 19.06.2011 passed by the Hon'ble II Additional Family Court, Chennai in I.A.(SR)No.6078 of 2011 in O.P.No.3447 of 2009 returning the same on the ground that the petitioner/wife shall appear in person to file the application.
Prayer in CRP.No.3074 of 2011: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 19.06.2011 passed by the Hon'ble II Additional Family Court, Chennai in I.A.No.294 of 2011 in O.P.No.3447 of 2009 condoning the delay of 61 days in filing petition to set aside the ex-parte divorce order dated 01.11.2010 in O.P.No.3447 of 2009.
For Petitioner : Mr.Manoj Sreevalsan (In both CRPs) For Respondents : Mr.B.Vivekavanan (In both CRPs)
COMMON ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent submit that the parties have settled the matter between themselves and a memorandum of compromise has been arrived at between them.
2.The memorandum of compromise dated 19.08.2015 duly signed by the petitioner and the respondent with their respective counsel is filed in original. They also submit that this memorandum of compromise could be recorded and the civil revision petition be disposed of in terms of the compromise filed.
3.Recording the submission made and taking the memorandum of compromise filed in original on file, both the civil revision petitions are closed in terms of memorandum of compromise filed. The memorandum of compromise shall form part of the order. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. No costs.
(Here enclosed the xerox copy of Memorandum of compromise)
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
vs
To
The II Additional Judge, Family Court,
Chennai .
+1cc to M/s.Manoj sreevarsan, Advocate sr.41359
C.R.P.Nos.3073 and 3074 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
ss(co)
ss(7/2/2017)
Mary Sowmya Rose rep.by Power Agent and father A.John Rose
Terance Alex
M.V. Muralidaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
