The High Court at Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution as infructuous because the original suit had already been heard and disposed of by the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore.
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29 .11.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
CIVIL REVISION PETITION (NPD) NO.1727 OF 2012
M. Saleem
... Petitioner
Vs.
M. Elias represented by his Power of Attorney Mr.Easwarasamy
..Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed passed by the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore in I.A.No.1584 of 2011 in O.S.No.607 of 2008 dated 1.12.2011.
For Petitioner : Mr. P.J.Rishikesh
For Respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
We are informed by Mr.Rishikesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner that nothing survives in this Civil Revision Petition in so far as the original suit itself stands heard and disposed of. An endorsement is made to that effect.
2
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.
msr
infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2012 is closed.
29.11.2016
msr
To
The Principal District Judge, Coimbatore
CIVIL REVISION PETITION (NPD) NO.1727 OF 2012
M. Saleem
M. Elias
Dr. Anita Sumanth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
