Dismissed

P.T. Veeralakshmi v. K. Ramu

Madras HC25 Apr 2016CRP/1242/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Civil Revision Petition under Art. 226 challenging an order dismissing an application for summons to produce records regarding tenancy, the petitioner sought leave to withdraw and approach the Record Officer instead, which was granted.

What did the court decide?

Allowance of withdrawal of the Civil Revision Petition with liberty to approach the Record Officer for a certified copy of the order.

P.T. Veeralakshmi Vs K. Ramu — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 25.04.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR

¶6

C.R.P (PD) No.1242 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.6795 of 2016

P.T.Veeralakshmi

... Petitioner

vs.

K.Ramu

... Respondent

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal orders dated 22.12.2015 made in I.A.No.827 of 2015 in P.O.P.No.162 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Court, Coimbatore and prays to set aside the same.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.Muthumani Doraisami

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against an order dismissing an application filed before the trial Court under Rule 75 of the Civil Rules of Practice for issuance of summons to the Tahsildar (Record Officer) to produce the records relating the order passed by him in favour of the plaintiff recording him as a tenant in respect of the suit property.

¶16

¶17

When this Court put a question as to whether any application was filed before the Record Officer for obtaining copy of such order, the answer came in the negative.

¶18

In addition, the learned senior counsel appearing for the

¶19

counsel on record for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks the leave of the Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition with liberty to first approach the Record Officer for the supply of certified copy of the above said order and in case, the Record Officer refuses to furnish such certified copy, to approach the trial Court with a fresh application for the issuance of summons to cause production of the relevant records or certified copies of the same. An endorsement to that effect has also been made.

¶20

Endorsement is recorded and the civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. Liberty as indicated above is granted. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶21

25.04.2016

¶22

srn To

¶23

The Principal District Court, Coimbatore

P.R.SHIVAKUMAR.J

srn

C.R.P (PD) No.1242 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.6795 of 2016

¶28

25.04.2016

P.T. Veeralakshmi v. K. Ramu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.T. Veeralakshmi v. K. Ramu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vellaiyammal (Decd) Vs Sundari

Muthusamy Vs Nanjappa Gounder

The Board of Control for Vs K.R. Muthukumar

K.Gopalasamy Vs Tmt.Govindammal

Subramaniam Vs M. Sundaramoorthy

Mrs D. Kalaivani Vs Eleumalai