Murugan v. Selvaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed civil revision petitions without any representation. The High Court dismissed the petitions for non-prosecution and coincidentally disposed of the connected civil miscellaneous petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
Petitions dismissed for non-prosecution; connected civil M.P. dismissed; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.04.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
C.R.P (PD) Nos.1116 and 1117 of 2016 and
C.M.P.No.6126 of 2016
1.Murugan 2.Subramaniam
3.Andavan ... Petitioners
vs.
1.Selvaraj 2.Gandhimathi ... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 09.09.2015 passed in I.A.No.277/2015 in O.S.No.170/2014 and I.A.No.275/2015 in I.A.No.741/2014 in O.S.No.170/2014 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Murugan Subramaniam
- petitioner
Andavan
- respondent
Selvaraj
- respondent
Gandhimathi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court