Allowed

Muthu Selvam @ Muthuchellam v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC17 Jun 2016CRL RC(MD)/378/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court, in a revision petition under CrPC, allowed the challenge against the cancellation of anticipatory bail by a Judicial Magistrate, set aside the cancellation order, relaxed prior bail conditions, and directed the lower court to act promptly on the final report filed by the police.

What did the court decide?

The bail cancellation order passed by the Judicial Magistrate is set aside and bail conditions imposed by this Court are relaxed.

Muthu Selvam @ Muthuchellam Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 17.06.2016

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS

¶6

C.R.L.RC(MD) No.378 of 2016 and M.P.(MD) No.4613 of 2016

¶7

1.Mutuselvam @ Muthuchellam 2.Puvanendiran 3.Ganapathy 4.Salivaganan 5.Kuberan 6.Stalin 7.Muneeswaran 8.Ulaganathan 9.Chandrasekar 10.Balu 11.Muniasamy 12.Muthukumar ... Petitioners/A1 to A12 -vsState Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sikkal Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.24 of 2016) ... Respondent/Complainant

¶8

PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 26.05.2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Court, Muthukulathur, Ramanathapuram District, in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5632 of 2016 and set aside the same.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mrs.M.Kala Murugappan For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

Aggrieved by the cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the accused, they have directed this revision.

¶12

2.I have perused the cancellation order and the connected papers. In the facts and circumstances, bail ought not to have been cancelled. Now, because of the subsequent events, the conditions becomes redundant because now investigation is over and final report has already been filed. But one disturbing factor is after filing final report on 28.04.2016, still no further action has been taken.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

3.In the circumstances, ordered as under:

¶15

(1) This revision is allowed.

¶16

¶17

(2) The bail cancellation ordered passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate is set aside. Bail conditions imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8372 of 2016 is relaxed.

¶18

(3) The learned Judicial Magistrate, Muthukulathur shall take further action on the final report filed in Crime No.24 of 2016 on the file of the Sikkal Police Station within 3 days of receipt of a copy of this order. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram shall ensure this.

¶19

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/

¶20

Assistant Registrar(AS)

¶21

/True Copy/

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar.

¶23

To:

¶24

1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram.

¶25

2.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram.

¶26

3.The Judicial Magistrate,

¶27

Muthukulathur, Ramanathapuram District.

¶28

4.The Inspector of Police, Sikkal Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

¶29

5.The Government Advocate (Criminal Side) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶30

Madurai.

¶31

+1CC to M/S.R.Murugappan, Advocate, SR.No. 31190

¶32

C.R.L.RC(MD) No.378	of 2016
and M.P.(MD) No.4613	of 2016
17	.06.2016

¶33

sj AM/GSV.PM/23.06.2016/2P/7C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Muthu Selvam @ Muthuchellam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthu Selvam @ Muthuchellam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manikandan Vs the Inspector of Police

R. Sundararajan Vs the Inspecor of Police

D. Soundarapandian Vs the Inspector of Police

David @ Lawrance David Vs the Inspector of Police

Backiam Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Packiyaraj Vs the Inspector of Police