Sundar Rajan v. the Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
A criminal original petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to stop police harassment during a High Marked Offence Procedure enquiry was closed by this court as it was settled between the parties.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 19.08.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.5366 of 2015 1.Sundarrajan 2.Loganathan 3.Jeyam 4.Chandrasekhar .. Petitioners Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Thondi, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The Sub Inspector of Police, S.P.Pattinam, Ramanathapuram District. 5.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd to 5th respondents not to harass the 1st to 4th petitioners under the guise of enquiry on the pendency of H.M.O.P. before the Sub Court, Devakottai.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muthukumar For respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Government Advocate (Criminal side)
ORDER
It is an application seeking a direction to the 1st respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ to direct the 2nd to 5th respondents not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry on the pendency of H.M.O.P. before the Sub Court, Devakottai.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant direction to police respondents not to harass petitioners during an H.M.O.P. enquiry.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.Sundarrajan
- petitioner
Loganathan
- petitioner
Jeyam
- petitioner
Chandrasekhar
- respondent
Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court