Disposed

A. Solaiappan v. the Director General of Police

Madras HC28 Sept 2016CRL OP(MD)/15856/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. directing the prosecution investigation to continue under supervision of the District Superintendent of Police to ensure fair investigation and timely filing of the final report.

What did the court decide?

Investigation by 5th respondent under supervision of 3rd respondent; final report to be filed within six months.

A. Solaiappan Vs the Director General of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 28.09.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15856 of 2016 and

¶7

Crl.M.P.(MD).No.7605 of 2016

¶8

A.Solaiappan

¶9

.. Petitioner/Defacto complainant

¶10

-vs-

¶11

1.The Director General of Police,

¶12

Office of Director General of Police,

¶13

Kamarajar Salai, Chennai.

¶14

2.The Superintendent of Police,(CBCID)

¶15

No.220, Pantheon Road,

¶16

Egmore, Chennai.

¶17

3.The Superintendent of Police,

¶18

Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶19

4.The Inspector of Police, CBCID, No.226/5, Nehru Street, NGO Colony,

¶20

Madurai Road, Virudhunagar District.

¶21

5.The Inspector of Police,

¶22

Irukkankudi Police Station,

¶23

Sattur, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.69/2016) ..Respondents/Respondents

¶24

Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the 3^rd respondent herein to withdraw the case in Crime No.69 of 2016 pending on the file of the 5^th respondent herein and entrust the same to the 4^th respondent for fair investigation and to file the final report within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶25

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶27

¶28

O R D E R

¶29

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 3^rd respondent to entrust the investigation in Crime No.69 of 2016 from the 5^th respondent to the 4^th respondent for conducting fair investigation.

¶30

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents and perused the records.

¶31

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) would submit that the 5^th respondent filed his counter stating that the doctor, who conducted the autopsy opined that the deceased would appear to have died of complications of drowning. The investigation revealed that the deceased had the habit of consuming liquor sitting near the well and chat with girls in mobile phone. The respondent seized the mobile phone and recorded the statement from the persons, to whom the deceased was talking at the time of occurrence and the investigation is being done under the guidance of the superior officers.

¶32

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs that the investigation in Crime No.69 of 2016 shall be done by the 5^th respondent under the supervision of the third respondent, the Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District and final report shall be filed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

¶35

5.With the above directions, this petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶36

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-II) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Director General of Police, Office of Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai. 2.The Superintendent of Police(CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road, Egmore,Chennai. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 4.The Inspector of Police, CBCID, No.226/5, Nehru Street, NGO Colony, Madurai Road, Virudhunagar District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Irukkankudi Police Station, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. 6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1cc to M/S.M.THIRUNVAUKKARASU, ADVOCATE SR.No. 56762 Pjl JA-SKS-RR-18.10.2016/3P:8C Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15856 of 2016 28.09.2016

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A. Solaiappan v. the Director General of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A. Solaiappan v. the Director General of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Soundarajan Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugan Vs the Inspector of Police

Ennatchimuthu Vs the Executive Divisional

Snekarani, Vs the Superintendent of Police

P.Thirunavukkarasu Vs the Commissioner of Police

R.Gopala Krishnan Vs the Inspector of Police