Allowed

Veeramurugan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC18 Aug 2016CRL OP(MD)/14786/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused under Sections 294(b), 341, 324, and 506(ii) IPC. The order imposed conditions including daily police reporting and bond execution, considering the injured party had discharged from the hospital.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail with execution of bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties, subject to daily reporting and other conditions.

Veeramurugan Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Eighteenth day of August Two Thousand Sixteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.14786 of 2016

¶6

VEERAMURUGAN ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.2

¶7

STATE REP BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THALLAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY. (CRIME NO.1694 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶8

For Petitioner : M/S.D.RATHINAVEL PANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.P.KANNITHEVAN,

¶9

Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶10

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶11

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶12

The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.2, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 324 and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.1694 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶13

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offence and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

¶14

3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital.

¶15

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten

¶16

thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶17

(i) the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

¶18

(ii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶19

(iii) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. (iv) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs.

¶20

State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶21

5.The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send a compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate, as to whether the petitioner is complying with the conditions or not.

sd/-

18/08/2016

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO

¶26

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II MADURAI

¶27

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT

¶28

3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶29

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶30

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶31

THALLAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.

¶32

+1. CC to M/S.D.RATHINAVEL PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.45412 RL/6C/2P/CK/SARI/19/8/2016

¶33

ORDER

¶34

¶35

CRL OP(MD) No.14786 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Date :18/08/2016

Veeramurugan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veeramurugan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Kumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

N.Ranjith Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Thamaraiselvan Vs the Inspector of Police

P. Rajkumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Salomon, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Murugan Vs the Inspector of Police