Allowed

Sathiyaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC4 May 2016CRL OP/9869/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners apprehending arrest for assault and obstruction offences. The order was conditional on executing a bond, posting sureties, and appearing before police and magistrates.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to execution of bond with sureties, appearance before police for two weeks, and compliance within stipulated timelines.

Sathiyaraj Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

Crl.O.P.No. 9 8 6 9 of 2 0 1 6

¶3

P.KA LAIYARA S A N , J.

¶4

The petitioners, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the

¶5

alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC

¶6

on the file of the respondent police, in Crime No. 176 of 2016 and seek anticipatory bail.

¶7

The case of the prosecution is that the accused joined together and assaulted

¶8

the defacto complainant and caused injuries.

¶9

Heard both sides.

¶10

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the

¶11

petitioners are innocent to the offences, that they have been falsely implicated in the

¶12

case, that there is a counter-case, that the injured has been discharged from the

¶13

hospital and therefore, they may be granted anticipatory bail.

¶14

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor concedes pendency of the counter-

¶15

case.

¶16

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the

¶18

fact that the counter-case is pending, nature of the offences and the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶19

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event

¶20

of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only)

¶21

with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶22

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period

¶23

of three weeks from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

04.05.2016

bbr/srn

Crl.O.P.No. 9 8 6 9 of 2 0 1 6

Sathiyaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sathiyaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chinnamma Vs Keerappa

Selvaraj Vs Nagarajan

Soori Konar Vs Tmt Papayee

P.Mohan, Vs the State Rep. by Its

Manikandan Vs the Inspector of Police

Manikandan Vs the Inspector of Police