Dismissed

R. Krishnakumar v. State Rep. by the Inspector

Madras HC7 Mar 2016CRL OP/825/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking direction to complete investigation in a case registered for offences under Sections 279 and 337 IPC. The Court dismissed the petition as the case was already disposed of in the court below.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed with costs; petitioner directed to pay Rs.1,000/- to Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority.

R. Krishnakumar Vs State Rep. by the… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.03.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.825 of 2016

¶6

R.Krishnakumar ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

State rep. by The Inspector of Police Tambaram Traffic and Investigation Wing Tambaram, St.Thomas Mount Kancheepuram.

¶9

Crime No.892 of 2008 ... Respondent

¶10

Prayer:-Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent to investigate and file final report in F.I.R.No.892 of 2008 on the file of the Tambaram Traffic and Investigation Wing, Tambaram, St.Thomas Mount, Kancheepuram.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Selvam For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This petition is filed for issuing a direction to the respondent to investigate and file a final report in F.I.R.No.892 of 2008 on the file of the Tambaram Traffic and Investigation Wing, St.Thomas Mount, Kancheepuram.

¶14

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the basis of the complaint lodged by the petitioner, a case in Crime No.892 of 2008 has been registered for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 337 IPC. But the respondents have not shown any interest to complete the investigation and file a final report. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief.

¶15

3.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the case has been taken as S.T.C.No.1189 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram and the same has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ already been disposed of.

¶16

4.Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed with costs. The petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One thousand only) to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, High Court, Chennai.

¶17

Sd/-

¶18

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶19

//True Copy//

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar
kj
To
1.The Inspector of Police
Tambaram Traffic and Investigation Wing
Tambaram, St.Thomas Mount
Kancheepuram.
2.The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Chennai.
Copy To
1.The Member Secretary,
Tamilnadu State Legal Services Authority,
High Court, Madras.
2.The Section Officer,
Criminal Section,
High Court, Madras.

¶21

+1cc to Mr.M.Selvam, Advocate, S.R.No.14614

¶22

Crl.O.P.No.825 of 2016 RSK(CO) CA(17/03/2016)

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R. Krishnakumar v. State Rep. by the Inspector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Krishnakumar v. State Rep. by the Inspector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uma Pinaghapani Vs the Inspector of Police

Suresh Babu Vs State Rep by

Kumaravel Vs State by Deputy Superintendent

Thangayammal Vs The District Collector

M/S.Myunghwa Automotive India Vs the Superintendent of Police

A.Raja Vs the Deputy Inspector General