Mr.J.Nagaraj v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
In Crl.O.P. No.7801 of 2016, the Madras High Court directed the Inspector of Police to enquire into a petitioner's representation regarding potential threats and dispose of the matter within three weeks.
What did the court decide?
Directed the second respondent to enquire into the matter and dispose of the representation within three weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.04.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA
Crl.O.P.No.7801 of 2016
Mr.J.Nagaraj ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. State by
The Commissioner of Police,
Office of the Commissioner of Police,
Vepery, Chennai.
2. State by
The Inspector of Police,
N-1, Royapuram Police Station,
Law & Order
Chennai. ... Respondents
Prayer :
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the second respondent the Inspector of Police, N-1, Royapuram Police Station, Chennai to provide adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jai Kumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking direction to the second respondent to provide adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the police to enquire into and dispose of the petitioner representation regarding threat to life within three weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr. J. Nagaraj
- respondent
State by The Commissioner of Police
- respondent
State by The Inspector of Police
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court