Disposed

Krishnan v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC11 Jul 2016CRL OP/7504/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC, the court directed the third respondent (Police) to inform the petitioner about the status of the missing person case. The petition was closed as a case had already been registered and transferred.

What did the court decide?

The third respondent-Police is directed to keep the petitioner informed about the developments regarding the missing man.

Krishnan Vs the Superintendent of Police — Madras HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 11.07.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

Crl.OP.No.7504 of 2016

¶6

Krishnan ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thiruvarur District, Thiruvarur. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruthuraipoondi Police Station, Thiruvarur District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Saravanampatti Police Station, Coimbatore City. ... Respondents

¶8

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the second respondent to register the complaint dated 23.09.2015.

¶9

For Petitioner :Mr.Ilayaraja Kandasamy

¶10

For Respondents :Mr.A.N.Thambi Durai

¶11

Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side)

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to direct the second respondent to register a case on the complaint dated 23.09.2015, given by the petitioner.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

¶15

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that, on the complaint given by the petitioner, a case in Crime No.305 of 2016, has been https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ registered by the Inspector of Police, Thiruthuraipoondi Police

¶16

Station, Thiruvarur District, for “man missing” and the same is under enquiry. Thereafter, on the point of jurisdiction, the case in Crime No.305 of 2016 has been transferred to the file of the Inspector of Police, Saravanampatti Police Station, Coimbatore District, under due intimation to the petitioner.

¶17

Under such circumstances, the third respondent-Police is directed to keep the petitioner informed about the developments if any, with regard to the missing man.

¶18

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶19

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
ds
To
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Office of Superintendent of Police,
Thiruvarur District,
Thiruvarur.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Thiruthuraipoondi Police Station,
Thiruvarur District.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Saravanampatti Police Station,
Coimbatore City.
4.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Chennai.
+1 CC to Mr.Ilayaraja Kandasamy Advocate Sr.No.38833
Crl.OP.No.7504 of 2016
RSY(CO)
KP(29.07.2016)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Krishnan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishnan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G Karunanidhi Vs Mr Iyyanarappan

Champalal P.Ranawat Vs Ravi Kumar

Saravanan Vs the Superintendent of Police

C. Manikandan, Vs M. Rani

T.K.C. Udayakumar, Vs the Commissioner of Police

S. Bhavani, Vs the Commissioner of Police