Disposed

R.Raman v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC28 Mar 2016CRL OP/6697/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to dispose of his criminal trial within a fixed timeframe to alleviate social stigma. The Court directed the trial court to conclude the trial within four months and ordered the police to produce witnesses as directed by the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Judicial Magistrate to dispose of C.C.No.14 of 2015 within four months and the respondent police to produce witnesses.

R.Raman Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 28.03.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.6697 of 2016

¶6

R.Raman .. Petitioner/Accused No.2

¶7

Vs. The Inspector of Police Cyber Crime Cell Coimbatore City Coimbatore. Crime No.12 of 2014 .. Respondent/Complainant

¶8

Prayer:-Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VII, Coimbatore to dispose of the trial in C.C.No.14 of 2015 within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Thangavel For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

¶10

This petition is filed for issuing a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VII, Coimbatore to dispose of the trial in C.C.No.14 of 2015 within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

¶11

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner herein has been arrayed as second accused in C.C.No.14 of 2015. He further submits that the petitioner is nothing to do with the alleged offence and due to the criminal case, he is facing stigma in the society. Hence, he prays for early disposal of the case in C.C.No.14 of 2015.

¶12

3.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶13

4.Considering the submissions made on both sides, since all the accused have been appeared before the trial Court, I am of the view, it is a fit case to give a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the case as early as possible. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Accordingly, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VII,

¶14

Coimbatore, is directed to dispose of C.C.No.14 of 2015 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondent police is directed to produce the witnesses as directed by the trial Court.

¶15

5.The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

¶16

kj Sd/Asst.Registrar

¶17

/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate No.VII, Coimbatore.
2. -do- thro The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Cyber Crime Cell,
Coimbatore City,
Coimbatore.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai.
+ 1 cc to Mr.M.R.Thangavel, Advocate Sr 19156
KR/30/3/16
Crl.O.P.No.6697 of 2016

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Raman v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Raman v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thavamani Vs R.Palani

K.Rasamuthu, Vs The Deputy Inspector General

Saththar Singh Vs State by

V.Vinodhini Vs The State Rep. by The

M/S.Dominion Power Systems Pvt. Vs the Inspector of Police

Jeeva Vs B.Nitya