Allowed

Arunkumar v. State Rep. by

Madras HC12 Feb 2016CRL OP/3189/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Crl. O.P. filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the Principal Sessions Judge (Special Judge for SC/ST Acts) to accept petitioners' surrender and consider bail application on the same day regarding offences under IPC and SC/ST Act, 1989.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Principal Sessions Judge to accept surrender of petitioners and consider bail application on the same day purely on merits.

Arunkumar Vs State Rep. by — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 12.02.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.3189 of 2016

¶6

1.Arunkumar

¶7

2.Dhinesh Kumar 3.Ayyappan 4.Aswin .. Petitioners Vs.

¶8

State rep. By The Inspector of Police Sankagiri Police Station Salem District. .. Respondent Crime No.78 of 2016

¶9

Prayer:-Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the Principal Sessions Judge, Salem (The Special Judge for SC/ST Act Cases) to consider petitioners bail petition in Crime No.78 of 2016 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Sankagiri Police Station, Salem District on their surrender, on the same day.

¶10

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 294(b), 323 IPC r/w. 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act, 1989, in Crime No.78 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, moves this petition seeking a direction to the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Salem (The Special Judge for SC/ST Act Cases), to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider their bail application on the same day on merits.

¶11

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent police.

¶12

3.Perused the records.

¶13

4.The offences complained of, other than the offence under the Special enactment, may not be serious in nature warranting initial detention in jail, even before considering the bail application.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

5.Therefore, the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Salem (The Special Judge for SC/ST Act Cases), is directed to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider their bail application on the very same day purely on the basis of merits and in accordance with law.

¶16

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

¶17

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Inspector of Police
Sankagiri Police Station
Salem District.
2.The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem
(The Special Judge for SC/ST Act Cases)
3.The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Chennai.
+ 1 cc to Mr.B.Vasudevan, Advocate Sr 2228 (24/2/16)
Crl.O.P.No.3189 of 2016
rsi(CO)
srg(19/02/2016)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Arunkumar v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arunkumar v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Parthasarathy Vs State Rep. by

F.Umar Sharieff Vs the Inspector of Police

V.P.Pavithran Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Loganathan Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Badhrinarayanan Vs Inspector of Police

Vasu Vs State Rep. by