Disposed

Dhayalan Aged 33 Yrs v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Dec 2016CRL OP/26594/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a direction to the SC/ST Special Court to consider his bail application. The Court directed the Special Court to consider the bail application on the same day, after issuing notice to the prosecution, to prevent aberration of justice.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Special Court to consider the Petitioner's bail application in Spl.SC.No.100 of 2016 on the same day after issuing notice to the Respondent/Prosecuting Agency.

Dhayalan Aged 33 Yrs Vs the Inspector of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated :12.12.2016

¶3

Coram

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.26594 of 2016

¶6

Dhayalan ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs. State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Marakkanam Police Station, Villupuram District. ... Respondent

¶8

Prayer : Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases Registered under SC/ST (POA) Act, Villupuram, Villupuram District to consider the bail application of Petitioner surrendering on the same day in Spl.SC.No.100 of 2016 on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases Registered under SC/ST (POA) Act, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.N.S.Kishore Kumar For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

¶10

Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner.

¶11

2.Mr.C.Emalias, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the Respondent.

¶12

2.According to the Petitioner, a case was registered under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 506(ii), 379 I.P.C. r/w. Section 3 (1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 1989 and 3 of the PPD Act.

¶13

3.It is averred in the Petition that there was no allegation against the Petitioner and his name was not found in the F.I.R. and the investigation has been completed and charge sheet has also been filed.

¶14

4.Considering the limited relief sought for by the Petitioner in the present Petition viz., passing of an Order in directing the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Registered under SC/ST (POA) Act, Villupuram, Villupuram District to consider his bail application surrendering on the same day in Spl.SC.No.100 of 2016, this Court, to prevent an aberration of Justice and to promote substantial cause of Justice, directs the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases Registered under SC/ST (POA) Act, Villupuram, Villupuram District to consider the bail application of the Petitioner in Spl.SC.No.100 of 2016 preferably on the same day (of course, after issuing notice to the Respondent/ Prosecuting Agency) and to pass necessary orders on merits and in the manner known to Law and in accordance with Law.

¶17

5.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶18

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Sgl
To
1.The Judge, the Special Court for Exclusive
Trial of Cases Registered under
SC/ST (POA) Act, Villupuram,
Villupuram District.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Marakkanam Police Station,
Villupuram District.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.N.S. Kishore Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.72927
gj(CO)
md(22/12/2016)

¶19

Crl.O.P.No.26594 of 2016

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dhayalan Aged 33 Yrs v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhayalan Aged 33 Yrs v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.New Kruba Jeweller Vs v.Kanchaa

P.Velmurugan, 20/M Vs the State Rep. by

A.Raja @ Rajkumar, Aged 28 Vs the State Rep. by Its

Dhayalan Aged 33 Yrs Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Felix Raj, Aged 37 Years, Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Thirumalaisamy, Vs State Rep. by