Remanded

Elanthiraiyan v. State Rep. by

Madras HC1 Dec 2016CRL OP/25954/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal original petition under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioner sought a direction for time-bound investigation and inclusion of forgery charges. The court refused a strict time-bound order but directed the police to expedite the investigation and file a final or closure report.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent police to complete investigation expeditiously and file a final or closure report.

Elanthiraiyan Vs State Rep. by — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.12.2016

¶3

C O R A M

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.25954 of 2016

¶6

Elanthiraiyan ...Petitioner/Defacto Complainant

¶7

Vs. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶8

State rep. by Inspector of Police Arani Town Police Station Arani, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶9

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to direct the respondent to investigate the case and file the final report in respect of Crime No.345 of 2016 on the file of Inspector of Police, Arani Town Police Station and include the offences of foregery and criminal investigation.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.D.rajagopal
For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias
Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R

¶11

This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the respondent to investigate the case and file the final report in respect of Crime No.345 of 2016 on the file of Inspector of Police, Arani Town Police Station and include the offences of foregery and criminal investigation.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the FIR was registered only on 24.05.2016.

¶15

Taking into consideration, the nature of the allegations in the FIR, this Court cannot issue any direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation in a time bound manner.

¶16

Hence, this petition is closed with a direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation as expeditiously as possible and either file a final report or closure report, as the case may be.

¶17

-Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Inspector of Police
Arani Town Police Station
Arani, Thiruvannamalai District.
2. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+ 1 cc to Mr.D.Rajagopal, Advocate Sr.No. 70747
Crl.O.P.No.25954 of 2016
CO/GJ
RRI 29/12/2016

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Elanthiraiyan v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Elanthiraiyan v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.Mohan, Aged 57 Years Vs the State Rep. by

M.Thirunavukkarasu Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Balaji Vs the Inspector of Police

K. Sujatha, Vs State Rep. by Inspector of

Shanmugavadivel, 48 Years Vs the Director General of Police

G.Ekambaram, M/47 Vs the State Rep. by Its