Disposed

R.Surya Prakash v. the Commissioner of Police

Madras HC10 Aug 2016CRL OP/14623/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal original petition under Section 482 CrPC, the High Court directed the respondent police to issue summons, conduct an enquiry on a complaint, and register an FIR or close the complaint.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondent police to issue summons to both parties, conduct an enquiry on the complaint dated 06.05.2015, and either register an FIR or close the same.

R.Surya Prakash Vs the Commissioner of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 10.08.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶6

Crl.OP.No.14623 of 2016

¶7

R.Suriya Prakash ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.The Commissioner of Police, Salem City, Salem.

¶10

2.The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by The Inspector of Police, Alagapuram Police Station, Salem District.

¶11

... Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the respondents to comply with the order dated 17.08.2015 made in Crl.OP No.17218 of 2015 within a stipulated time.

¶13

For Petitioner :Mr.M.Devaraj For Respondents :Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to comply with the order dated 17.08.2015 made in Crl.OP No.17218 of 2015 within a stipulated time.

¶16

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

P.N.PRAKASH,J

Today, Mr.G.Dharmaraj, Sub Inspector of Police, Alagapuram Police Station (Fairlands Police Station), Salem, is present.

¶21

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that neither the petitioner nor the opposite party are co-operating in the enquiry, despite asking them to appear before the Police.

¶22

It is seen that the Police have not sent any summons to both the parties. The respondent-Police is directed to issue summons to both the parties, and conduct enquiry on the complaint dated 06.05.2015 given by the petitioner and take action in accordance with law, and either register an FIR or close the same as the case may be.

¶23

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

10.08.2016

1.The Commissioner of Police, Salem City, Salem.

¶28

2.The Inspector of Police, Alagapuram Police Station, Salem District.

¶29

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai.

¶30

Crl.OP.No.14623 of 2016

R.Surya Prakash v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Surya Prakash v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Ramesh Vs The State of Tamilnadu

P.Selvaraj Vs The Commissioner of Police

J.Jonbosco @ Jegan Vs Venkatesan

G.Ponram Vs Karpagam @ Santhakumari

S. Mukanchand Bothra, Vs P. Mani

S.Chidambaram Vs Sp.Nachiappan