Disposed

S. Munirathinam v. the State by Inspector of

Madras HC3 Feb 2016CRL OP/1258/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Four Criminal Original Petitions were filed invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking directions to register a case based on a complaint. The Court found that a police enquiry had been completed and closed on 08.07.2015. The petitions were disposed of with liberty to approach an appropriate forum for alternative relief.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum for alternative relief.

S. Munirathinam Vs the State by Inspector of — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.02.2016

¶2

CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA

¶4

Crl.OP.Nos.1258, 1279, 1280 and 1602 of 2016

¶5

S.Munirathinam ..Petitioner in CrlOP.No.1258 of 2016 D.Parthiban ..Petitioner in CrlOP.No.1279 of 2016 K.Jayakumar ..Petitioner in CrlOP.No.1280 of 2016 K.Shankar ..Petitioner in CrlOP.No.1602 of 2016

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State by Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Commissioner Office, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. ..Respondents in all CrlOPs

¶8

Prayer in all CrlOPs: Criminal Original Petitions are filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioners dated 12.06.2015.

¶9

For Petitioners :Mr.D.Charles Muthu Santhan For Respondent :Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor

¶10

COMMON ORDER

¶11

The petitioners have come forward with these petitions seeking for a direction, directing the respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioners dated 12.06.2015.

¶12

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that even though the complaints dated 12.06.2015 have been received by the respondent, he has not shown any interest to enquire the matter and to register the complaint. Hence, the petitioners have come forward with these petitions for the above stated relief.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

3.At this juncture, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that based on the complaints given by the petitioners, petition enquiry has been conducted and the same has been closed on 08.07.2015. A copy of the closure report has been furnished today.

¶15

Recording the said submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, these Criminal Original Petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach appropriate forum for alternative relief.

¶16

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
mps
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
Central Crime Branch,
Commissioner Office,
Vepery,
Chennai-600 007.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
Madras High Court,
Madras.
+3 ccs to Mr.D.Charles Muthu Shanthan Advocate
sr.7108 & 7109,7110
Crl.OP.Nos.1258, 1279,
1280 and 1602 of 2016
aa18/02/2016

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S. Munirathinam v. the State by Inspector of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Munirathinam v. the State by Inspector of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Ronald Santha Kumar Vs the State Rep by

Kursheet Sherif @ Akshar Vs State Rep. by

D.Gopalakrishnan Vs R.J.Veeraraghavan

R.Vijay Prashanth Vs the Inspector of Police

M/S.Fullerton India Credit Vs the Commissioner of Police

Mr.R.Prakasam Vs the State Rep. by