Disposed

T.Muthu Krishnan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC3 Feb 2016CRL OP/1062/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal original petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought direction to register an FIR and investigate a complaint. The Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that an enquiry was conducted and closed, furnishing a closure report. The court disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed with liberty to approach appropriate forum for alternative relief.

T.Muthu Krishnan Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 03.02.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA

¶5

Criminal Original Petition No.1062 of 2016

¶6

T.Muthu Krishnan : Petitioner

¶7

State rep by The Inspector of Police, Triplicane Police Station, Chennai-600 002. : Respondents

¶8

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register an FIR, investigate and file the final report on the basis of the complaint dated 27.06.2015 in accordance with law.

¶9

The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, directing the respondent to register an FIR, investigate and file the final report on the basis of the complaint dated 27.06.2015 in accordance with law.

¶10

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that even though the complaint dated 27.06.2015 has been received by the respondent, he has not shown any interest to investigate the matter and to register the complaint. The petitioner has filed a document to show that he has already filed Crl.OP.No.17384 of 2015, in which, this Court, by order dated 17.08.2015, directed the respondent police to register his complaint, after following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1.

¶11

3.At this juncture, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry has been conducted and the same has been closed. A copy of the closure report has been furnished today.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

Recording the said submission of the learned Additional
Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed
of with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum
for alternative relief.
mps
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
Triplicane Police Station,
Chennai-600 002.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
Madras High Court,
Madras.
+ 1 cc to Mr.S.Ezhil Raj, Advocate SR 7152
vgi(co)
prk17/2 Crl.O.P.No.1062 of 2016

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Muthu Krishnan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Muthu Krishnan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Ronald Santha Kumar Vs the State Rep by

Kursheet Sherif @ Akshar Vs State Rep. by

D.Gopalakrishnan Vs R.J.Veeraraghavan

R.Vijay Prashanth Vs the Inspector of Police

M/S.Fullerton India Credit Vs the Commissioner of Police

Mr.R.Prakasam Vs the State Rep. by