Partly allowed

Ramachandra Velayutham, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC23 Aug 2016CRL MP(MD)/7147/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court modified bail conditions imposed on petitioners in CRL.OP(MD)No.11196 of 2016. On hearing arguments, the court directed the petitioners to report before the respondent police only as and when required.

What did the court decide?

Bail conditions were modified to direct petitioners to report before the respondent police only as and when required.

Ramachandra Velayutham, Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of August Two Thousand Sixteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.7147 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.11196 of 2016

¶6

1 RAMACHANDRA VELAYUTHAM

¶7

2 PERIYAMARIAPPAN 3 SELVARAJ

¶8

... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 1,2 & 4

¶9

Vs THE STATE REP.BY ,

¶10

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ALANGULAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶11

CRIME NO.12/2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.OP(MD)No. 11196 of 2016 on the file of this Honourable Court.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.SIVAKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶14

Heard both sides.

¶15

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioners are complying with the condition regularly.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition imposed already on the petitioners is modified to the effect that the petitioners are directed to report before the respondent police as and when required.

sd/-

23/08/2016

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai - 625 023.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

¶23

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TENKASI. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI.

¶24

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ALANGULAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶25

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶26

+1. C.C. to M/S.S.SIVAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.46489 PS CSL/CK/SAR-I/24.08.2016: 2P/6C

¶27

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.7147 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.11196 of 2016 Date :23/08/2016 (1/2)

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ramachandra Velayutham, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramachandra Velayutham, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murugan Vs the Inspector of Police

Meenatchi @ Meena Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Authithiya Pandian Vs the Inspector of Police

Palaraman @ Mokkan Vs the Inspector of Police

Palaraman @ Mokkan Vs the Inspector of Police

Boopathy Vs the Inspector of Police