Dismissed

S. Veeramurugan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC1 Aug 2016CRL MP(MD)/6106/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners, granted anticipatory bail under specific conditions, sought modification of a requirement to appear daily at a police station. Alleging threats by police personnel, petitioners prayed for the condition's modification. The Court rejected the submissions and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition for modification of bail conditions was dismissed.

S. Veeramurugan Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the First day of August Two Thousand Sixteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.6106 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.11458 of 2016

¶6

1 S. VEERAMURUGAN

¶7

2 SEENIRASU

¶8

3 CHELLADURAI 4 SIVABALAN ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4

¶9

STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UDAIYALIPATTY POLICE STATION,PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT, CR NO. 55/2016. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to pass an order to modify the order made in Crl. O. P. (MD) NO. 11458 of 2016 dated 13.07.2016 in Crime No. 55 of 2016 on the file of the Respondent police and pass such or other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.PALANI RAJA, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.ANBARASAN Government Advocate(Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

This petition has been filed praying to modify the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)No.11458 of 2016, dated 13.07.2016, by this Court.

¶13

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been granted anticipatory bail with certain conditions and the petitioners have been directed to appear before the respondent police daily at 06.00 p.m. until further orders. As per the said order, when the petitioners went to the respondent police station, they threatened them to foist a false case. Therefore, the petitioners have come up with the present petition praying to modify the condition with regard to appearance before the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondent police.

¶14

3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that there is no such threatening at the hands of the respondent police.

¶15

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), this Court is not inclined to modify the condition imposed on the petitioners and accordingly this petition is dismissed.

¶16

sd/-

¶17

01/08/2016

¶18

/ TRUE COPY /

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶20

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶21

Madurai - 625 023.

¶22

¶23

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,KEERANUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,PUDUKKOTTAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶24

UDAIYALIPATTY POLICE STATION,PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶25

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶26

ORDER

¶27

¶28

CRL MP(MD) No.6106 of 2016

¶29

¶30

CRL OP(MD) No.11458 of 2016

¶31

Date :01/08/2016

¶32

AA/NGM-MP/SAR-I/05.08.2016/2p-5c

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S. Veeramurugan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Veeramurugan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murugan Vs the Inspector of Police

M. Ansar Vs the Inspector of Police

Mahalingam Vs the Inspector of Police

Makesh @ Makeshwaran Vs the Inspector of Police

Andiyappan @ Rajasekar Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

N.Muthalagu Vs the Sub Inspector of Police