Allowed

Kalirajan v. the Inspecor of Police

Madras HC22 Apr 2016CRL MP(MD)/3468/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble Madras High Court allowed a petition by three accused persons seeking relaxation of bail conditions imposed in a prior criminal appeal order. The court reduced the conditions to require reporting to the police for interrogation as needed.

What did the court decide?

Relaxed the bail conditions; petitioners ordered to report to the respondent police for interrogation as and when required.

Kalirajan Vs the Inspecor of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Friday, the Twenty Second day of April Two Thousand Sixteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.3468 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.4619 of 2016

¶6

1 KALIRAJAN

¶7

2 MANIKANDAN

¶8

3 TIRUPATHY ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3

¶9

¶10

THE STATE REP.BY

¶11

INSPECOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, SIVAKASI,VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT,

¶12

CR NO. 168 OF 2016. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to fully relax the condition imposed in the order in Crl.OP(MD) No.4619 of 2016 dated 21.03.2016 on the file of this Honorable Court.

¶14

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S S.SELVAKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶15

Heard both sides.

¶16

According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), the petitioners are complying with the conditions imposed by this Court regularly.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioners is relaxed and the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

sd/-

22/04/2016

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

¶25

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAKASI.

¶26

DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶27

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION, SIVAKASI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶28

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶29

+1. C.C. to M/S S.SELVAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.22590

¶30

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.3468 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.4619 of 2016 Date :22/04/2016

¶31

GJM/SKS/RR/AR-I-27.4.16-2P-6C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kalirajan v. the Inspecor of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalirajan v. the Inspecor of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chella Muthu Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Rameshkumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Maha @ Mahalakshmi Vs the Inspector of Police

Chinnathai Vs the Inspector of Police

Balakrishnan Vs the Inspector of Police

Siva Vs the Inspector of Police