S.Varamani v. Pugazh
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition for contempt of counsel was dismissed. The Director was directed to furnish a copy of the charge sheet to the petitioner within a week. If still aggrieved, the petitioner was open to approach the appropriate court.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the respondent to furnish a copy of the charge sheet to the petitioner within one week.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.03.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN
Contempt Petition No.623 of 2015
in
Crl.O.P.No. 3064 of 2014
S. Vairamani .. Petitioner Vs. Mr. Pugazh The Inspector of Police E-6 Minjur Police Station Thiruvallur District. .. Respondent
Contempt Petition filed praying to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 07.03.2014 made in Crl. O .P. No. 3064 of 2014 and pass further orders.
For Petitioner : Mr. C. Sivakumar
For Respondent : Mrs. Shabana, GA (Crl.Side) O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner needs to be punished for wilful disobedience of the court order dated 07.03.2014 due to the failure to serve the charge sheet.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Vairamani
- respondent
Mr. Pugazh The Inspector of Police E-6 Minjur Police Station Thiruvallur District
Coram
S. Vaidyanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court