Disposed

Mr.M.Sivaraj v. Hansrajvarma

Madras HC4 Feb 2016CONT P/429/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging violation of an earlier High Court order in W.P.No.6141 of 2014. The court found that the respondents complied with the order via a G.O.(Ms) dated 03.02.2016. The court accepted this fact, held nothing survived, and closed the petition with the discharge of contemnors.

What did the court decide?

The Contempt Petition was closed and the contemnors were discharged.

Mr.M.Sivaraj Vs Hansrajvarma — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 04.02.2016

¶4

C O R A M

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU

¶6

Contempt Petition No.429 of 2015

¶7

M.Sivaraj ..Petitioner

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

1.Mr.Hansrajvarma The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government Forest and Environment Department Fort St.George Chennai-600 009.

¶10

2.Mr.Vinoth Kumar The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest Panagal Building Saidapet Chennai-600 015. 3.Mr.Balathavachalam The District Forest Officer Erode Forest Range Erode.

¶11

4.Mrs.Snehalatha The Accountant General of T.N. O/o.The Accountant General Teynampet Chennai-600 018. ..Respondents

¶12

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for willfully and deliberately disobeying the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.6141 of 2014, dated 18.06.2014, under the Contempt of Court Act.

¶13

For petitioner : Mr.P.Rajesh

¶14

For respondents : Mr.N.Inbanathan Government Advocate (Forest)

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

Alleging that the order of this Court dated 18.06.2014 made in W.P. No.6141 of 2014 has been violated by the respondents, the petitioner has come up with this Contempt Petition.

¶19

Today, when the matter is taken up, Mr.N.Inbanathan, the learned Government Advocate appearing

¶20

for the respondents submitted that the order of this Court dated 18.06.2014 has been complied with by issuing G.O.(Ms) No.13 Environment and Forests (F.R.2) Department, dated 03.02.2016. Mr.P.Rajesh, the learned counsel for the petitioner also accepted the same.

¶21

In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. Hence, the Contempt Petition is closed and the contemnors are discharged.

¶22

//Certified to be true copy//

¶23

Dated at Madras this the day of 2016. COURT OFFICER (O.S.)

¶24

From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶25

CO/3/3/2016

¶26

One CC to M/s.P.Rajesh, Advocate, S.R. No.1430/2016. One CC to Government Pleader, S.R. No.1431/2016.

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mr.M.Sivaraj v. Hansrajvarma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.M.Sivaraj v. Hansrajvarma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murugan Vs Smt. K. Chandra

C.Saraswathy Vs the Commissioner

Vijaya Vs Rajendran

D.Mahendran Vs Dr.M.Mathivanan IAS

L.S.Sudandaradoss Vs Kirren Kurala, IAS

Vs