Dr.Ashok Nathaniel v. M.Kanahu
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition alleging disobedience of an order directing vacate and pay rent, the Court found that the tenant had already handed over possession and paid the rent. Lacking intentional violation, the Court closed the petition without costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 04.11.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR
Cont.P.No.2677 of 2013 M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2014 in C.R.P.Nos.2824 and 2825 of 2012
Dr.Ashok Nathaniel .. Petitioner
Versus
Mr.M.Kanahu, Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, O/o. Regional PF Commissioner, Tamil Nadu & Pondicherry States, No.31, Filter Bed Road, Vellore 632 001. .. Respondent
Prayer: This Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 70/71 to punish the respondents for having committed contempt of Court for disobeying the order, dated 01.03.2013 in C.R.P.(NPD) No.2824 of 2012.
For Petitioner : M/s.Ramalingam Associates
For Respondent : Mr.K.Ramu
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the continuation penalty for disobedience of the order in C.R.P. (NPD) No. 2824 of 2012 shall be imposed
Whether the contempt petition should be closed on account of compliance achieved
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr. Ashok Nathaniel
- respondent
Mr. M. Kanahu
Coram
S. Manikumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court