C.R.Padma v. P.K.Jagannatha Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, the petitioners represented that the respondent had paid the outstanding sum of Rs. 25,000 via cheque, discharging all dues. The court closed the contempt petition and awarded no costs.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed upon payment of the fine. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated: 24.10.2016
Coram
The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
Contempt Petition 2650 of 2013
- C.r.Padma
2. C.R.Thiagaraja Varma
3. C.R.Vani
4. C.R.Raghava Varma
5. C.R.Harihara Varma .... Petitioners
Vs.
P.K.Jagannatha Rao .... Respondent
Contempt Petition filed lunder Sections 11 of the
contempt of courts Act to punish the respondent for
committing contempt of court for willful violation of the
affidavit of undertaking dated 17.07.2013 and also for
willful disobedience of the order of this court passed in
CRP (NPD) No.3729 of 2012 dated 17.07.2013.
For Petitioners : Mr.J.Ram For Respondent : Mr.Ashok Menon
O R D E R
It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that today, a further sum of Rs.25,000/https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed upon payment of the outstanding sum by the contemner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.r.Padma
- petitioner
C.R.Thiagaraja Varma
- petitioner
C.R.Vani
- petitioner
C.R.Raghava Varma
- petitioner
C.R.Harihara Varma
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court