The court disposed of this contempt petition by granting the respondents four additional weeks to comply with a prior order, noting that the vigilance report was awaited and there was no willful disobedience. The petition is closed based on these submissions.
Respondents granted four weeks to comply with the earlier order; contempt petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.04.2016
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI
and
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Cont.P. No.227 of 2015
N.Kanakaraj .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.Kannegi Packianathan, I.A.S.,
Chairman,
State Level Scrutiny Committee
and Secretary to Government,
Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare
Department, Chennai - 9.
2.B.Jothilingam,
The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Hosur, Krishnagiri District. .. Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act r/w Article 215 of The Constitution of India to
punish the respondents for the deliberate violation of the
order of this Court passed in W.P.No.18288 of 2013 dated
22.10.2013.
For Petitioner .. Mr.Udayakumar for M/s.Karan and Uday For Respondents .. Ms.T.T.Girija, Govt. Advocate
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, J .)
Alleging that the respondents have disobeyed the
order dated 22 October 2013 passed in W.P.No.18288 of 2013, the petitioner has come up with this Contempt Petition.
petition, a Division Bench of this Court passed the following order:
afresh and pass orders within a period of two months from the date of submission/affidavit by the petitioner."
respondents submits that the process has already been
initiated. She further submits that the vigilance enquiry report is awaited and as such, the respondents may be given some more time. It is submitted that there is no wilful https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ disobedience.
3
4.In view of the submission made by the learned
Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, further four weeks' time from today is granted to the respondents to comply with the order and pass appropriate orders. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed.
mmi
SD/
JOINT REGISTRAR(OS)
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2016.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
To
1.The Chairman,
State Level Scrutiny Committee
and Secretary to Government,
Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare
Department, Chennai - 9.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Hosur, Krishnagiri District.
JM/CO/23/05/2016
One CC to Mr.Karan&Uday, Advocate SR.5510/2016 One CC to Government Pleader,SR.5433/2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents should be given further time to comply with the previous order.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
N.Kanakaraj
Kannegi Packianathan
B.Jothilingam
Satish K.Agnihotri
V.Bharithidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
