M.Chinnathambi v. Tmt.v.Thenmozhi
Case brief
What is this about?
In a petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act for wilful disobedience of an order to remove encroachments, the court closed the petition based on the Government Pleader's statement that all encroachments were removed and the road would be kept free from re-encroachment.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt Petition is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.01.2016
CORAM
The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
Contempt Petition No.2195 of 2015
M.Chinnathambi .. Petitioner -vs1.V.Thenmozhi, The Tahsildar, Attur Taluk, Salem District. 2.Suresh, The Executive Engineer, State Highways Department, Opposite to National Hotel, Salem. .. Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for wilfull disobedience of the order dated 26.08.2014 in W.P.No.2387 of 2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Adithya Reddy For Respondents : Mr.STS.Moorthy Government Pleader O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is tenable in view of the respondents' statement regarding removal of encroachments.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Chinnathambi
- respondent
V. Thenmozhi
- respondent
Suresh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court