Disposed

S. Ramesh v. Thiru Rajinikanth

Madras HC24 Aug 2016CONT P/1753/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order closed a contempt petition filed for willful disobedience of a previous court order dated 29.10.2015. The court recorded that by the learned Judicial Magistrate's intervention, the subject lorry was returned to the petitioner, and consequently closed the proceedings and the sub-application.

What did the court decide?

The Contempt Petition and Sub Application were closed by recording that the order in Crl.O.P.No.22784 of 2015 had been complied with.

S. Ramesh Vs Thiru Rajinikanth — Madras HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 24.08.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶6

Contempt Petition No.1753 of 2016 &
Sub.A.No.444 of 2016
S.Ramesh ... Petitioner
Vs

¶7

Thiru.Rajinikanth, Inspector of Police, CSCID Department, Vellore Unit, Vellore

¶8

Thiru.Subhrangsudas, Chief Terminal Manager, Tondiarpet Terminal, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Marketing Division, Ennore High Road, Chennai 600 081. ... Respondents

¶9

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 29.10.2015 in Crl.O.P.No.22784 of 2015.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Rajasekaran For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias (for R1)

¶11

Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr.Md. Fayaz Ali (for R2)

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

This Contempt Petition has been filed alleging

¶14

willful disobedience of the order issued by this Court on 29.10.2015 in Crl.O.P.No.22784 of 2015.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel appearing for both

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ sides and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor

¶17

appearing for first respondent.

¶18

¶19

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor

¶20

submitted that the order dated 29.10.2015 passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.22784 of 2015 has been complied with and the lorry has been returned to the petitioner by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Vellore, on 08.08.2016.

¶21

Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. Consequently, the Sub Application is also closed.

¶22

SD/ JOINT REGISTRAR(OS) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2016. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. CO/06/09/2016 One CC to Mr.Mohamed Fayez Ali, SR.10866/2016 pvs / sra To:

¶23

The Inspector of Police, CSCID Department, Vellore Unit, Vellore.

¶24

The Chief Terminal Manager, Tondiarpet Terminal, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Marketing Division, Ennore High Road, Chennai 600 081.

¶25

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S. Ramesh v. Thiru Rajinikanth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Ramesh v. Thiru Rajinikanth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Senthilraja, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.

Lingam @ M.Elangovan Vs the Inspector of Police

Sai Jaganathan Vs Kumaran

Madhan Mohan Vs Sangeetha

K.Palaniswami, (Aged About 77 Vs M/S.Yoshiaki Chemicals Co.

Lada Miron Vs the Inspector of Police