K.M.Balusamy v. S.N.Raja
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras closed the filed contempt petition after recording the petitioner counsel's submission that an appropriate relief would be sought through the Wakf Tribunal. No punishment was imposed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.01.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.1728 of 2015
1.K.M.Balusamy
2.P.Senthil Kumar .. Petitioners
V.
Mr.S.N.Raja, Sub Registrar,
Kelamangalam, Krishnagiri District.
.. Respondent
Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act 70/71 praying to punish the respondent for wilful
disobedience of the order dated 31.03.2015 passed in W.P.No.2189
of 2014 on the file of this Court.
For Petitioners .. Mr.D.Shivakumaran
For Respondent in Cont.P .. Mr.R.Lakshmi Narayanan, AGP
For Respondent in W.P. .. Mr.V.Lakshmi Narayanan
For 2 nd Respondent in W.P. .. Mr.S.Sadasharam
ORDER
This contempt petition is filed by the petitioners alleging wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.2189 of 2014 dated 31.03.2015 by the respondent.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioners, after some arguments, submits that he will approach the Wakf Tribunal and get appropriate relief and requests that this contempt petition may be closed. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.M. Balusamy
- petitioner
P. Senthil Kumar
- respondent
Mr. S.N. Raja
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court