Contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act was dismissed as the underlying order was found to be compliant. Petitioner given liberty to challenge the rejection order.
Contempt Petition closed; liberty to challenge proceedings in ROC.No.PA6/4678/2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.10.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
Cont.P.No.1680 of 2016
N.Arumugam .. Petitioner
vs.
1.Thiru.Hans Raj Verma, I.A.S.,
The Secretary to Government,
Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department,
Fort Saint George-Secretariat,
Chennai-600 009.
2.Thiru.K.Baskaran, I.A.S.,
The Director,
Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Directorate,
Panagal Building,
Saidapet, Chennai-600 015.
3.Mrs.M.Lakshmi, I.A.S.,
The District Collector,
Villupuram District Collectorate,
Villupuram – 605 602.
4.Thiru.Karunanidhi,
The Commissioner,
Sankarapuram Panchayat Union,
Villupuram District -606 401. .. Respondents
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 25.01.2016 in W.P.No.2356 of 2016
For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Narayanan For Respondents : Mrs.Vasudha Thiagarajan Additional Government Pleader
2
O R D E R
This Contempt Petition has been filed for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court dated 25.01.2016 made in W.P.No.2356 of 2016, wherein this Court permitted the petitioner to submit one more representation to the respondents 1 to 3 by enclosing a copy of this order as well as copies of the earlier representations, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the respondents 1 to 3, on receipt of the same, are directed to consider the said representation on merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight
weeks thereafter without fail.
3
with, this Contempt Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is liberty to challenge the proceedings of the third respondent in ROC.No.PA6/4678/2014 dated 29.05.2016, if he is so advised.
SD/-
JOINT REGISTRAR(OS)
Jvm
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2015.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
SS/CO/15/11/2015
One CC to Government Pleader, SR.13362/2016
One CC to MR.K.S.NARAYANAN, SR.13183/2016
To
1.Thiru.Hans Raj Verma, I.A.S., The Secretary to Government, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, Fort Saint George-Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.Thiru.K.Baskaran, I.A.S., The Director, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Directorate, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015.
3.Mrs.M.Lakshmi, I.A.S., The District Collector, Villupuram District Collectorate, Villupuram – 605 602. 4.Thiru.Karunanidhi, The Commissioner, Sankarapuram Panchayat Union, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Villupuram District -606 401.
4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Arumugam
Hans Raj Verma
K.Baskaran
Lakshmi
Karunanidhi
R.Subbiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
