R. Sankar v. T. Balamurugan
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed for disobedience of an order was closed as the court found the order was complied with and the petitioner acknowledged the same.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :03.06.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
Contempt Petition No.1044 of 2016
1.R.Sankar
2.R.Vishnupriya
3.R.Divya ... Petitioners
Vs
Shri T.Balamurugan,
The Tahsildar,
Ambattur Taluk Office,
Ambatur, Chennai-600058. ... 1st Respondent
Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 70/71 to punish the respondent for
deliberately committing contempt by willful disobedience of
the order dated 06.11.2015 made in W.P.No.36025 of 2015.
For Petitioner : Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.I.Arokiasamy, Government Advocate
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up, the learned Government https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Advocate appearing for the first respondent has submitted that the order passed by this Court dated 06.11.2015 in
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Sankar
- petitioner
R.Vishnupriya
- petitioner
R.Divya
- respondent
Shri T.Balamurugan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court