Dismissed
S.a.Miyajan v. K.T.Shanmugam
Madras HCCOMP.A/547/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court dismissed three company applications and directed the registry to remove the associated company petition from the cause list, noting compliance with earlier orders.
What did the court decide?
Registry directed to remove captioned applications and company petition from cause list.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
Company Application Nos.547, 548 and 679 of 2013 175 and 176 of 2016 in
¶3
C.P.No.194 of 2006
¶4
RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.
¶5
- I am told by the applicant that there has been compliance of the earlier order dated 15.07.2016.
¶6
- The Registry is directed not to reflect any longer the captioned applications in the cause list.
¶7
C.A.No.679 of 2013
¶8
- This application was listed on 15.07.2016. It appears that
¶9
inadvertently it did not get included in the order passed on that date.
¶10
3.1. The applicant, i.e., Mr.T.N.Jothi Manian, who appears in person,
¶11
does not press the application.
¶12
- Accordingly, the captioned application is dismissed, as having worked itself out, in view of the order passed on 15.07.2016.
Coram
AI extract
RAJIV SHAKDHER
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court