Mr.Vijay D.Dattaram v. Better Labels Manufacturing
Case brief
What is this about?
RAJIV SHAKDHER,J. 1. This application has…
What did the court decide?
Directed that needful be done within two weeks for the petitioner to deposit Rs.50,000/- as directed by the Court for initial expenses.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Comp.A.No.26 of 2016
RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.
- This application has already been disposed of by this Court, vide order
dated 27.09.2016.
- The Registry is directed not to show the application in the cause list.
C.P.No.07 of 2016
- The Official Liquidator (OL) has filed his report dated 28.11.2016, based on the copy of the order dated 27.09.2016, downloaded from the website.
3.1. In the said report, the OL states that notices have been issued to the Ex-Directors, for filing statement of affairs and furthermore, meeting of the secured creditors is slated for 30.11.2016.
- I am informed by the OL that the petitioner has not deposited the sum
of Rs.50,000/- as directed by this Court.
RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Petitioner
Coram
RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court