Disposed

The Chairman v. the Inspector of Labour

Madras HC30 Nov 2016CMP(MD)/347/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order addresses a stay petition in a writ appeal concerning service regularization. The court directed the appellant to cure procedural defects within seven days; failure to do so would result in automatic dismissal of the matter. The judgment contains no legal analysis or substantive decision beyond this procedural direction.

What did the court decide?

Appellant directed to cure defects within 7 days upon pain of automatic dismissal of the matter.

The Chairman Vs the Inspector of Labour — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of November Two Thousand Sixteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Honble Mr.Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN and The Honble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶5

CMP(MD) No.347 of 2016 IN

¶6

WA(MD) No.46 of 2016

¶7

1 THE CHAIRMAN

¶8

TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND

¶9

DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TAMIL NADU

¶10

ELECTRICITY BOARD),

¶11

800, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI.

¶12

2 THE CHIEF ENGINEER (RECRUITMENT),

¶13

TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND

¶14

DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED,

¶15

(FORMERLY KNOWN AS TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD),

¶16

800, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI.

¶17

3 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, KARUR ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CIRCLE,

¶18

TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND

¶19

DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED,

¶20

(FORMERLY KNOWN AS TAMIL NADU

¶21

ELECTRICITY BOARD), KARUR. ... PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS

¶22

Vs 1 STATE REP.BY,

¶23

THE INSPECTOR OF LABOUR, KARUR.

¶24

2 M.ANNADURAI ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶25

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to stay the operation of the impugned order dated 01.04.2015 passed in WP.(MD).No.15852/2012 until the disposal of the WA.(MD). No.46/2016 and thus render justice.

¶26

Prayer in WA(MD). 46/ 2016 :

¶27

To prefer this memorandum of grounds of Appeal against the order dated 01.04.2015 passed by Her Lordship Honourable Justice in WP.(MD).No.15852/2012. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

PRAYER IN WP(MD).15852/ 2012 :

¶29

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to regularize the petitioner s services from the date on which the petitioner completed 480 days of service and further directing the respondents to pay the petitioner the arrears of difference in wages and all other consequential attendant benefits as per law and by implementng the order of the Inspector of Labour, Karur in Na.Ka.No. 392/2008 dated 15.02.2010 passed under Section 5 r/w Section 6 (4) of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 and pass such further or other orders.

¶30

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.M.S.JOHNNY BASHA, Advocate for the petitioner the court made the following order:-

¶31

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Petitioner shall comply with the defects pointed out by the Registry on or before 21.12.2016, if not,this matter shall stand dismissed automatically without any further reference to this Court.

¶32

sd/-

¶33

30/11/2016 / TRUE COPY /

¶34

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO

¶35

1 THE INSPECTOR OF LABOUR, KARUR.

¶36

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.347 of 2016 IN WA(MD) No.46 of 2016 Date :30/11/2016

¶37

AAM JM SAR1 09.02.2017 2P 2C

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Chairman v. the Inspector of Labour

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Chairman v. the Inspector of Labour

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.S.Bhadran Vs Tamilnadu Khadi and Vill.

C.R.Usha Vs C.R.Ramesh Babu

T.K. Naganathan, Vs the Secy to Govt.

The Industries Commissioner, Vs Packiam

P.Balamani Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

The Director General of Police Vs E.Jayakumar, Formerly