K.Arumuga Thevar, v. M.Palaniraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Order condoning delay in preferring an appeal upon payment of court fees.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 492 days in file was condoned.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Fourth day of February Two Thousand Sixteen
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
CMP(MD) No.5 of 2016 IN
SA(MD) No.SR36557 of 2014
1 K.ARUMUGA THEVAR, 2 A.RAMACHANDRAN, 3 A.MARIAPPAN, 4 S.PARAMASIVAN, ... PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS
M.PALANIRAJ, ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 492 days in representing the above SA(MD) SR.No.36557 of 2014.
SA(MD)SR.No.36557 of 2014 : against the Judgement and decree passed in A.S.No.8 of 2013 on the file of Additional Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli dated 26/03/2014 confirming the Judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.218 of 2009 on the file of 1st Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli dated 13/07/2012.
ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. M.P.SENTHIL, Advocate for the petitioner the Court made the following order:-
Parties & counsel
- appellant
1 K.ARUMUGA THEVAR, 2 A.RAMACHANDRAN, 3 A.MARIAPPAN, 4 S.PARAMASIVAN
- respondent
M.PALANIRAJ
Coram
R.MAHAADEVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court