Dismissing an application to condone delay in setting aside abatement, the court noted a lack of instructions from legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant.
CMP No.8877 of 2004 to set aside order of abatement dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CMP.NO.8877 OF 2004 IN SA NO.1821 OF 1991
G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appeal
dismissed as abated, in view of the demise of the sole appellant. The legal representatives have taken out an application to condone the delay of 265 days in filing the petition to set aside the order of abatement. Now the learned counsel for the petitioners reports that, the legal representatives of the sole appellant have not given him any instructions to pursue further, inspite of writing letters to one of the proposed petitioner by name Shanmugam. In the light of the above submissions, the CMP No.8877 of 2004 to
set aside order of abatement is dismissed.
25.11.2016
dpq
2
G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
dpq
CMP.NO.8877 OF 2004 IN SA NO.1821 OF 1991
25.11.2016
G.JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
