Disposed
N.Dhanalakshmi v. N.Senthamarai
Madras HCCMP/13077/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A single judge condoned the delay of 275 days in filing a Review Application without adjudicating on its maintainability.
What did the court decide?
Condoned the delay of 275 days and ordered the application to be admitted.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
C.M.P.No.13077 of 2016
¶3
in Review Application.S.R.No.27088 of 2015 in
¶4
S.A.No.2125 of 2004
¶5
K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J.
¶6
This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 275 days in representing the Review Application.
¶7
- Learned Advocate General appearing for the respondent submitted that the very Review Application itself is not maintainable.
¶8
- Needless to say, that such objection can be made and considered either at the time of hearing the review application or while considering the application for condoning the delay if any, in filing the review application.
¶9
- Since the present petition is filed only to condone the delay in representing the review application, without going into the merits of the matter and considering the reasons set out in the petition seeking to condone the delay in representation, the delay is condoned. The application is ordered.
¶10
20.10.2016
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether to condone the delay of 275 days in filing the Review Application.
Coram
AI extract
K.Ravichandrababu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court