Allowed

The Oriental Insurance v. K. Sathish Kumar

Madras HC22 Nov 2016CMA(MD)/173/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed the civil miscellaneous appeal and confirmed the compensation award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. Permission was granted to the claimant to withdraw the deposited amount, with liberty given to the insurance company to recover dues from the vehicle owner.

What did the court decide?

Award confirmed; permit claimant to withdraw deposit via RTGS; liberty to insurer to recover amount from vehicle owner.

The Oriental Insurance Vs K. Sathish Kumar — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Twenty Second day of November Two Thousand Sixteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

CMA(MD) No.173 of 2015

¶6

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., through its Branch Manager, Door No.20, 1^st Floor, K.A.K. Complex, Gandhi Road, Kallakkurichi, Villupuram District.

¶7

...Appellant/2^nd Respondent

¶8

vs.

¶9

1)K.Sathish Kumar 2)M.Prabhakaran

¶10

... 1 Respondent /Petitioner 1 ... 2^nd Respondent/R1

¶11

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Subordinate Judge, Vedasandur, dated 29/10/2013 made in MCOP.No.133/2012.

¶12

DECREE : This Appeal coming on for hearing on this day upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, the order of the Lower Court, and material papers relating to the case and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.C.RAMACHANDRAN, Advocate for the appellant and of Mr.H.LAKSHMI SHANKAR, Advocate for the respondent No.1, this Court doth the decree and order as follows:-

¶13

1 That the Award of Compensation passed by the Motor Accidents claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Vedasandur dated 29/10/2013 made in MCOP.No.133/2012 be and hereby is confirmed in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal herein.

¶14

2 That the appeallant Insurance company has already deposited the entire award amount with proportionate accrued interest and costs to the credit of the claim petition before the Tribunal, the respondent/Claimant be and hereby is permitted to withdraw the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ same,less the amount already withdrawn, through RTGS, by filing the necessary application before the Tribunal.

¶15

3 That the appellant Insurance Company is giving liberty to recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle as per decision laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Nanjappan's Case therein and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposal of accordingly.

¶16

4 That there be no costs in the appeal.

¶17

/ TRUE COPY /

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶19

¶20

The Subordinate Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,Vedasandur.

¶21

COPY TO:

¶22

THE RECORD, KEEPER, V.R.SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶23

+1cc to Mr.h.Lakshmi Shankar, Advocate Sr.No. 71476 +1cc to Mr.C.Ramachandran, Advocate Sr.No. 72398

¶24

JAM/12.12.16/SK-SKN/ 2p-5c

¶25

Dismissing of the appeal against the award of compensation passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal , Subordinate Judge, Vedasandur, dated 29/10/2013 made in MCOP.No.133/2012 etc.,

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Oriental Insurance v. K. Sathish Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Oriental Insurance v. K. Sathish Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Shanthi

Minor.Suresh, Vs O.Sathyamoorthy

V.Chellamuthu Vs D.Tamil @ Tamilarasi

K.Sathish Kumar Vs M.Prabhakaran

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs R.Vijayalakshmi

Padmavathi, Vs Selvaperumal