Allowed

M/S.Artemis India Private v. Customs Excise Service

Madras HC4 Mar 2016CMA/456/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a civil miscellaneous appeal, setting aside a Tribunal order directing service tax deposit. The Court granted a one-time adjournment, directing the Tribunal to rehear the matter on merits after ensuring advance notice to the appellant.

What did the court decide?

Civil miscellaneous appeal allowed; Tribunal order set aside; Tribunal directed to fix hearing date and hear the application on merits; CMP closed.

M/S.Artemis India Private Vs Customs Excise… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04.3.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN

¶7

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.456 of 2016

¶8

and

¶9

CMP.No.3459 of 2016

¶10

M/s.Artemis India Pvt.Ltd., rep.by its Managing Director Mr.A.Surendraraj ... Appellant

¶11

¶12

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Shastri Bhavan, Chennai-6.

¶13

The Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai II Commissionerate, Chennai-40. ... Respondents

¶14

APPEAL under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 16.10.2015 made in Misc.Order No.41317 of 2015 in ST/S/ 41374/2014 in ST/41150/2014 on the file of the first respondent herein.

¶15

For Appellant : Mr.J.V.Niranjan

¶16

for M/s.J.V.Niranjan & Associates

¶17

For Respondent-2 : Mr.A.P.Srinivas

¶18

Judgment was delivered by V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J

¶19

The assessee has come up with the above appeal, challenging an order of the Tribunal, directing the assessee to make a deposit of the entire amount of service tax to the tune of Rs.1,09,91,890/- on or before 18.1.2016.

¶20

Heard Mr.J.V.Niranjan, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr.A.P. Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the second respondent.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

It appears that the Tribunal fixed 16.10.2015 as the date for hearing the miscellaneous application for stay and waiver. On 15.10.2015, the learned counsel for the appellant circulated a letter that he was not well. But, the Tribunal proceeded to pass orders on 16.10.2015.

¶23

The letter dated 15.10.2015 is filed before us. The order dated 16.10.2015 shows his non appearance. Therefore, we are of the considered view that one opportunity can be granted to the appellant.

¶24

Accordingly, the civil miscellaneous appeal is allowed, the order of the Tribunal is set aside and the Tribunal is directed to fix date for hearing of the miscellaneous application, inform the learned counsel for the appellant (new counsel) in advance, hear the application on merits and dispose it of in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, the above CMP is closed.

¶25

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
RS
To
1.The Customs,
Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Shastri Bhavan,
Chennai-6.
2.The Commissioner of Service Tax,
Chennai II Commissionerate,
Chennai-40.

¶26

+2cc's to Mr.J.V.Niranjan, Advocate, S.R.No.13956

¶27

+1cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Advocate, S.R.No.14443

¶28

CMA.No.456 of 2016 & CMP.No.3459 of 2016

¶29

EV(CO) CA(07/03/2016)

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Artemis India Private v. Customs Excise Service

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Artemis India Private v. Customs Excise Service

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Transport Logistics Vs the Customs, Excise and

The Commissioner of Central Vs M/S Shinhan Plasto India

M/S Eveready Vs Customs

M/S.Picasso Overseas Vs the Customs, Excise and

M/S.Tril Infopark Limited Vs the Income Tax Officer (Tds)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Shri.K.S.Thirumalaivasan