In this appeal, the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal based on a new Circular issued by the Central Board of Customs and Excise. The court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal as withdrawn.
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.3089 of 2010 dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 11.2.2016
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
The Honourable Mr.Justice N.KIRUBAKARAN
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.3089 of 2010
The Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai II Commissionerate, Chennai-35. ...Appellant Vs M/s.Sundaram Dynacast Pvt.Ltd., Chennai-98. ...Respondent
APPEAL under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 24.5.2010 made in Final Order No.581/2010 on the file of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai.
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the above appeal in view of the circular in Circular : 390/Misc./163/2010-JC dated 1.1.2016 issued by the Central Board of Customs and Excise, New Delhi. He has also made an endorsement in the bundle today to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai.
+1cc to Mr.E.Vijay Anand, Advocate, S.R.No.8741
CMA.No.3089 of 2010
sai(CO)
srg(23/02/2016)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai II Commissionerate
M/s. Sundaram Dynacast Pvt. Ltd.
V. Ramasubramanian
N. Kirubakaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
