Dismissed

Commissioner of Central v. M/S Mrf Ltd.

Madras HC9 Feb 2016CMA/2797/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against a Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal order as withdrawn by the Appellant. Liberty was granted to revive the appeal within twelve weeks if the withdrawal was inadvertent, with questions of law left open.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to revive within twelve weeks if withdrawn inadvertently; questions of law left open.

Commissioner of Central Vs M/S Mrf Ltd. — GST and Indirect Tax | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 09-02-2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA

¶5

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.2797 of 2011

¶6

Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Large Taxpayer Unit, 1775, Jawaharlal Nehru Inner Ring Road, Anna Nagar Western Extension, Chennai-600 101. .. Appellant.

¶7

Versus M/s.MRF Ltd., Tiruvottiyur, Chennai-600 019. .. Respondent.

¶8

Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court under Section 35 G of the Central excise Act, 1944 against the Final Order No.260/2011 of the Common Final Order No.226-275/2011, dated 4.2.2011, on the file ST/266/2009, of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai.

¶9

The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Department had submitted that they may be permitted by this court to withdraw the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, in view of the instructions issued, in F.No.390/Misc./163/2010-JC, issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated 17.12.2015, as the monetary limit relating to the matter is less than Rs.15,00,000/-.

¶10

The learned counsels had further submitted that liberty may be granted to the Appellant/Department to revive the Civil

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in the relevant circular issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs.

¶13

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Department, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clear that the questions of law, which may arise for the decision of this Court, in the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, are left open to be considered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance with law. It is also made clear that it would be open to the Appellant/Department to revive the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in the relevant instructions issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.

¶14

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To The Registrar, Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai. +1cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Advocate sR.9009

¶15

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.2797 of 2011 teh[co] srg(19/02/2016)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Commissioner of Central v. M/S Mrf Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Commissioner of Central v. M/S Mrf Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash J.Shah Vs the Commissioner (Appeals)

M/S.Classic Builders (Madras) Vs the Customs, Excise and

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S A-1235 Madurai Tk Agricul

The Asst. Commissioner of Vs Shri S.Nagarajan

The Commissioner of Income Vs M.Vijayan

The Commissioner of Income Vs M.Vijayan