K.Saraswathy v. P.Shanmugam
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeals dismissed as infructuous because the underlying suit was disposed of and a pending appeal was filed. No costs awarded; connected petitions closed.
What did the court decide?
Appeals dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.12.2016
CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
CMA.Nos.1159, 1160, 1174 & 1175 of 2009 and MP.Nos.1,1,1 & 1 of 2009
CMA.Nos.1159 & 1160 of 2009 : 1.K.Saraswathy 2.Chinnaswamy 3.P.Jeevanantham 4.K.Sankaran 5.R.Palanisamy 6.Nalla Perumal 7.K.Saravanan 8.K.Sengodan ... Appellants Vs. 1.P.Shanmugam 2.P.Ravichandran ... Respondents CMA.No.1174 & 1175 of 2009: 1.Kandaswamy 2.Shanmughasundaram 3.K.Ganesan @ K.Palanisamy ... Appellants Vs. 1.P.Shanmugam 2.K.Saraswathy ... Respondents
Common Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Order 43 Rule 1(u) of the Code of Civil Procedure Code 1908 as amended by Act 104 of 1976 against the fair and final order dated 18.04.2009 made in (i) I.A.No.1957 of 2008 in O.S.No.417 of 2005 (ii) I.A.No.3095 of 2008 in O.S.No.417 of 2005 (iii) I.A.No.1956 of 2008 in O.S.No.416 of 2005 (iv) I.A.No.3093 of 2008 in O.S.No.416 of 2005 on the file of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.V, Coimbatore.
For Appellant : Mr.V.Manohar (in all CMAs) For Respondents : No Appearance (in all CMAs)
2
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Saraswathy and others
- respondent
P.Shanmugam and others
Coram
N.SESHASAYEE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court