The single judge dismissed the application after accepting the respondents' counsel's statement agreeing not to transfer or encumber the charged property until the underlying award is challenged and adjudicated.
Application disposed of on acceptance of respondents' counsel's undertaking not to transfer the charged property.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
A.No.448 of 2015
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.,
award has already been passed in the matter on 12.05.2016.
parties, that the property, which is adverted to in the schedule appended to the judges summons, is owned by respondent No.2, and, that, the said property stands charged to the applicant.
2
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.,
gg
5.1. Resultantly, the counsel for the applicant does not wish to press the application any further.
04.07.2016
gg
A.No.448 of 2015
Applicant
Respondent No.2
RAJIV SHAKDHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
