Hdfc Bank Ltd. v. S. Malathi
Case brief
What is this about?
Application regarding Advocate Commissioner remuneration and vehicle seizure closed amicably due to settlement; additional fee directed.
What did the court decide?
Directed applicant to pay additional Rs.10,000 remuneration to Advocate Commissioner.
What the court decided
1
Application No.3856 of 2015
T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J.
By order, dated 23.06.2015, this Court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to seize and possess the vehicle in question. He was paid a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) as initial remuneration.
- Pursuant to the warrant of commission issued by this Court to seize the vehicle, today, it is represented by the Advocate Commissioner that the vehicle could not be traced, as it is reported by the respondent that the same has been missing. However, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. He has also filed a memo to that effect.
- Recording the fact that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, this application is closed.
4.Today, the learned Advocate Commissioner has sought for additional remuneration. Considering the same, a further sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) is directed to be paid by the
2
applicant as additional remuneration within a period of one week from
T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Advocate Commissioner
- respondent
Unnamed Respondent
Coram
T.S. Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court