Petitioner withdrew the Writ Petition seeking passport return without prejudice. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and closed connected miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :08.07.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P(MD).No.8655 of 2015 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2015
S.Saravanan ... petitioner
Vs
1.The Passport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Madurai.
2.The Inspector of Police, Kovilangulam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents
This Writ Petition has been filed praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent vide Token No.10, dated 12.05.2015 in connection with the impounding of the petitioner's passport bearing No.K3484213 issued on 30.04.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to return the petitioner his passport.
ORDER
The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition without prejudice to his other legal rights. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for by the petitioner. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
2
/True Copy/
Sd/Assistant Registrar
Sub Assistant Registrar
ssm
To
1.The Passport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Madurai.
Gcs/27/07/2015/2p/3c
W.P(MD).No.8655 of 2015
08.07.2015
S. Saravanan
The Passport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Madurai
The Inspector of Police, Kovilangulam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District
R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
