Dismissed

S. Velmurugan v. the Divisional Manager

Madras HC10 Jun 2015WP(MD)/3648/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition was withdrawn by the petitioner during trial before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dated 10.06.2015. The court dismissed the Writ Petition No. 3648 of 2015 as withdrawn and closed the connected miscellaneous petition without adjudicating the merits.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected M.P. closed. Registry to produce impugned order upon request within one month.

S. Velmurugan Vs the Divisional Manager — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 10.06.2015

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.3648 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015

¶7

S.Velmurugan ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Divisional Manager, (Human Resource Development), Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Tirunelveli.

¶10

2.Dharmaraj, (Divisional Manager-HRD),

¶11

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Tirunelveli.

¶12

3.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Papanasam, Tirunelveli.

¶13

4.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Tisayanvilai, Tirunelveli.

¶14

5.The General Manager (SIC), Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Tirunelveli. ...Respondents

¶15

PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the impugned records in A.Aa.No.120 38/Ne Ya II/ Tha.Aa.Po. 9a/thili/2014 dated 24.02.2015 and consequent releiving order in No.001/Pa Pa II/ena. Aa.Po.Ga/thili/2015, dated 28.02.2015 and to quash the same.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saji Bino For Respondents : Mr.K.Sathiya Singh for R1, 2, 3, 4 & 5

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the same, this Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.is closed.

¶19

2.Registry is directed to hand over the original impugned order, after substituting the same by taking a xerox copy, if the learned counsel for the petitioner approaches the Registry within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(AS)

¶22

/True copy/

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

2
To 1.The Divisional Manager, (Human Resource Development), Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Tirunelveli.
2.The Divisional Manager(HRD), Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Tirunelveli.
3.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Papanasam, Tirunelveli.
4.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Tisayanvilai, Tirunelveli.
5.The General Manager (SIC), Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Tirun	elveli.
+1cc to Mr.S.Saji Bino, Advocate in SR.29235	W.P.(MD)No.3648 of 2015
	10.06.2015
nbj
pbk/pps 16/06/2015 ::2p-7c:(IT)

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S. Velmurugan v. the Divisional Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Velmurugan v. the Divisional Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Esakki Ammal Vs the District Adi Dravidar

P.Parimala Vs The Director of Medical

K. Arifyanayagam, Vs the Inspector General

G.Sathaiah, Vs the Agicultural Production

R. Suronmani, Vs the Project Director

N.Krishnamoorthy, Vs the Director General