Three writ petitions challenging a departmental proposal were admitted. The Court directed the Principal Secretary to consider the proposals sent by the Town Panchayats on 14.08.2012 and pass orders on merits within four months.
First respondent to consider proposals dated 14.08.2012 and pass orders on merits within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06.03.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.(MD)Nos.3085 TO 3087 of 2015 & M.P(MD)Nos.1,1, & 1 of 2015 & 2,2 and 2 of 2015
W.P(MD)No.3085 of 2015
M.Shunmugam ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Dept., Secretariat,Fort St.George,
Chennai-600 009.
3.The Executive Officer, Kalugumalai Town Panchayat, Thoothukudi District.-628 552 ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the proposal sent by the second respondent in his proceedings in Roc.No.21950/2008/A1 dated 14.08.2012 to regularize the petitioner's service in the cadre of Work Inspector or any other equivalent post i.e. Overseer insofar as the petitioner concerned within the time limit that may fixed by this Court.
W.P(MD)No.3086 of 2015
S.Muthu Kumaravel ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Dept., Secretariat,Fort St.George,
Chennai-600 009.
3.The Executive Officer, Manimuthar Town Panchayat, Ambasamudram, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Tirunelveli District. ...Respondents
2
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the proposal sent by the second respondent in his proceedings in Roc.No.21950/2008/A1 dated 14.08.2012 to regularize the petitioner's service in the cadre of Work Inspector or any other equivalent post i.e. Overseer insofar as the petitioner concerned within the time limit that may fixed by this Court.
W.P(MD)No.3087 of 2015
S.Masilamani ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Dept., Secretariat,Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Director of Town Panchayat, Kuralagam, Chennai-600 108.
3.The Executive Officer, Ilanji Town Panchayat, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the proposal sent by the second respondent in his proceedings in Roc.No.21950/2008/A1 dated 14.08.2012 to regularize the petitioner's service in the cadre of Work Inspector or any other equivalent post i.e. Overseer insofar as the petitioner concerned within the time limit that may fixed by this Court.
For Petitioners in all WPs :Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents in all WPs :Mr.M.Rajarajan Govt.Advocate for R1 & R2. :Mr.K.Mahesh Raja Govt.Advocate for R3
COMMON ORDER
Mr.M.Rajarajan, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. Mr.K.Mahesh Raja, learned Government Advocate takes https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ notice for the third respondent and by consent of both the parties, the main writ petitions itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission.
3
Sd/Assistant Registrar(T&P)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
gsr
TO
1.The Principal Secretary,
Municipal Administration & Water Supply Dept., Secretariat,Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Director of Town Panchayat,
3.The Executive Officer,
4.The Executive Officer,
Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District.
W.P.(MD)Nos.3085 to 3087 of 2015 06.03.2015
RG.16.03.2015 3P.10C.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the first respondent to consider the proposals regarding regularization of service.
Whether a time limit should be fixed for the disposal of the regularization proposals.
M.Shunmugam
S.Muthu Kumaravel
S.Masilamani
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Dept.
The Director of Town Panchayat, Kuralagam
The Executive Officer, Kalugumalai Town Panchayat
K.Ravichandrababu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
