The Madras High Court directed the Tahsildar to consider a petitioner's subdivision application pending before him to be disposed of within eight weeks, considering any third party objections.
Direction to respondent to consider the application and pass orders within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.03.2015
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
Writ Petition (MD) No.2747 of 2015
S.Kandasamy
... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Tahsildar, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District.
2.The Taluk Deputy Survey Inspector, Taluk Survey, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District. ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to survey measure and sub-divide the Petitioner's property comprised in S. No. 40/2 covered by Patta No. 37 standing in his name situated at Katha Parai Village, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur as per the application of the petitioner dated 28.01.2015.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Appadurai For Respondents : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Government Advocate.
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Chandrasekar, learned Government Advocate who takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage.
2.The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the respondents herein to survey, measure and sub-divide his property comprised in S.No.40/2 covered by Patta No.37 situated at Katha Parai Village, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur as per the application of the petitioner dated 28.01.2015.
3.It is seen that the petitioner has already made an application on 28.01.2015 before the first respondent seeking for the very same relief. It is stated that the such application is still pending.
4.Therefore, without expressing any view on the claim made by the petitioner, I only direct the first respondent to consider the application of the petitioner dated 28.01.2015 and pass appropriate orders on merits https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and in accordance with law also by considering as to whether any third party's objection is pending in respect of the petitioner's patta as on today. Such exercise shall be done by the first respondent within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
2
5.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No
costs.
Sd/
Assistant Registrar
/True copy/
sub Assistant Registrar(c.s)
To
1.The Tahsildar, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District.
+1cc to Special Government Pleader,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai in SR.No
+1cc to M/S. K.Appadurai, Advocate in SR.No. 9991
TS/09.03.2015/2P-5C
Writ Petition (MD) No.2747 of 2015
02.03.2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner is entitled to a direction to consider the subdivision application and consider third party objections.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Kandasamy
The Tahsildar, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District
The Taluk Deputy Survey Inspector
K.Ravichandrababu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court